Dear Sarbajit Royji, Thanks for raising this issue.On one hand,cic decides without calling appellants like me whereas others(real misusers)have been invited again and again. Take specifically one case in the court room of IC(OK) of Mr.Faqir chand(Retd.Rly employee).He has been declared misuser during hearing by Hon'ble IC(OK).After that same matter has been heard two times without taking notice of his stand to restrain such misusers.
Remark of faqir chand in the decision-The Commission asked the Appellant if this was so. He did not deny this saying that he would continue to ask for information and if in the process,the Department was harassed, well so, be it.-------12. The Commission has taken a very serious view of this application. After all, the RTI Act, 2005 is meant for genuine information seekers to fulfil the objectives set out in the preamble of the Act and not to settle scores either with other individuals or with the Department where the Applicant has worked earlier. The Applicant, on being told this, apologized and promised that he would not do so in future. Despite it,commission considered same fresh second appeals on the same matter of scooter loan which was disposed in cic.gov.in/CIC- Orders/Decision_15122006_5.pdf cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_28092007_05.pdf cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_21052007_29.pdf cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_05032007_25.pdf Repeated hearings on same matter can also be one of the reasons for occupying 85% capacity of commission. regards Manoj K.Kamra --- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is a matter of grave concern that 85% of recent CIC decisions (as > per CIC website) are limited to 2 Ministries - Banks and Railways, are > almost exclusively on service matters. >
