Thanks for your reply. The reading of sec 28 says: 28. (1) The competent authority may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:
(i) the cost of the medium or print cost price of the materials to be disseminated under sub-section (4) of section 4; (ii) the fee payable under sub-section (1) of section 6; (iii) the fee payable under sub-section (1) of section 7; and (iv) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, prescribed so, how high court can deny appearance before commission??? --- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Bhushan. > > Office of District and Sessions Judge (Punjab State) falls under State > Information Commission. At this level, they are administratively part > of the Law Dept (Ministry) of the State, and ALSO covered by High > Court Rules of the concerned High Court. > > High Courts fall "under" no Commission. Being "Constitutional > Authorities", they are defined as "competent authority" for purposes > of RTI ACT. Although it is open to citizens to file a 2nd appeal > against order of FAA of these bodies, the High Courts are within their > powers to decline to appear before the Commissions. Please read > sections 27 and 28 in this context. > > Sarbajit > > --- In [email protected], Bhushan Kumar <b4bhushan@> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > the office of district sessions judge of any district of PUNJAB > falls under whom? > > CIC > > or > > State commission > > > > also, the punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh is under whom? > > CIC or state commission > > > > > > pls clarify. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on > http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
