--- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) A PIO can only give copies / access to information which exists
in
> material form.
>
> 2) File a First Appeal within 30 days of receipt of PIO's reply. In
> this you may state as GROUND A that the information exists but is
> being suppressed by the PIO. GROUND B is that the information is
being
> supressed TO the PIO. GROUND C is that destruction or suppression of
> information which is subject of the request is liable to penalty
under
> RTI Act. In your FA dont agitate irrelevant things like corruption
and
> what the P/A actually did or should have done - ie. dont state your
> opinions / conjectures / presumptions / grievances as facts.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- In [email protected], Brando Conscience
> <brandoconscience@> wrote:
> >
> > Sir
> >
> > I have been told by PIO that he is not able to trace information
> related to quasi judicial proceedings on a corrupt complaint made by
> me against a Govt officer. The Public Auth that time in 2003 who was
> suppose to attend my these corrupt complaints has moved on to
another
> Govt Org in transfer. It is obvious he did not do anything and
abetted
> in corrupt issues.
> >
> > What are the options for me. I have proof that he received those
> complaint letters but no reply in 2004 AND EVEN TODAY WHICH RESULTED
> IN THE CORRUPT OFFICER GETTING AWAY SCOT FREE. Though he
> was prosecuted later for similar issues, but my query is what the
> concerned supervising mechanisms did ?
> >
> >
> > The Public Auth obviously ignored these applications against the
> corrupt officer and today PIO is acting helplessly.
> >
> > What RTI act says about any official not producing information or
> any official not maintaining records of his decisions.
> >
> > Can they be dealt for suppressing information.
> >
> > Regards
> > BRANDOCONSCIENCE
>
