Videography
  If an applicant wishes to make copies of records/ samples given to him for 
inspection
  at his own expenses, it is not for the Public Authority to object to the form 
in which the
  copies are being made, provided it is restricted to the information 
permissible under
  the Act. There is no provision in the Act disallowing Videography, and 
therefore,
  cannot be excluded unless it violates the parameters of any information 
sought and
  agreed to be provided.
  CIC/WB/A/2006/OO144 -- 3 Aug,2006
   
   
  

Sidharth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
          > A decision by CIC on 03rd Aug 2008, allowing the videography at his 
own 
> expenses.

Can you plz send me a copy of this decision or at least a link to it.
I tried but could not find it.

Sidharth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: T N Krishnamoorthi
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 10:38 PM
Subject: [rti_india] Re: S O S : Taking Photographs during inspections not 
allowed

Dear Mr Sidharth,

The extract is as under:
... if an applicant wishes to make copies of records/ samples given
to him for inspection at his own expenses, it is not for the Public
Authority to object to the form in which the copies are being made,
provided it is restricted to the information permissible under the
Act. There is no provision in the Act disallowing Videography...
- Central Information Commission 03-08-2006

Krishnamoorthi, Andaman

--- In [email protected], Sidharth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello friends,
>
> My request to take photographs during inspections are thwarted by
> CPIOs. They say that provisions in RTI act do not allow taking
> photographs. Has anyone faced similiar situation like this.
>
> I am curious to know whether I can take Photographs during file
Inspection?
>
> If taking photographs is allowed, then how shall I counter these
PIOs?
>
> Pleas help.
>
> Sidharth
>



                           

       
---------------------------------
 Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy!  Invite them now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to