Whats a "haering" and what is "not to aprticiapate" about? Manoj
--- On Mon, 12/8/08, sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [rti_india] Re: RTI_India to the rescue To: [email protected] Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 11:31 PM Since the "First party" - was not present, the "Second party" could not take advantage of Rule 7(4) of CIC Appeal Procedure Rules to seek assistance of "Third party" while presenting their points. Or perhaps Mr.H has a better explanation than mine ;-) Sarbajit --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com, Manoj Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote: > > Would some MI6 agent please help me decipher this code embedded in the decision, on Page 2. > > "allowed to sit in the haering but asked not to aprticiapate. " > > Manoj Pai > Ahmedabad > > --- On Mon, 12/8/08, sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote: > Recent Activity 80 New MembersVisit Your Group Yahoo! Finance It's Now Personal Guides, news, advice & more. Y! Messenger All together now Host a free online conference on IM. Y! Groups blog The place to go to stay informed on Groups news! . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
