Thanks dear Manoj pai and Sarabjit for the information. Regards Dr. JN Sharma
On 12/8/08, Manoj Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whats a "haering" and what is "not to aprticiapate" about? > > Manoj > > --- On Mon, 12/8/08, sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rti_india] Re: RTI_India to the rescue > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 11:31 PM > > > > > > > Since the "First party" - was not present, the "Second party" could > not take advantage of Rule 7(4) of CIC Appeal Procedure Rules to seek > assistance of "Third party" while presenting their points. > > Or perhaps Mr.H has a better explanation than mine ;-) > > Sarbajit > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com, Manoj Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote: >> >> Would some MI6 agent please help me decipher this code embedded in > the decision, on Page 2. >> >> "allowed to sit in the haering but asked not to aprticiapate. " >> >> Manoj Pai >> Ahmedabad >> >> --- On Mon, 12/8/08, sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote: >> > > > > > Recent Activity > > > 80 > New MembersVisit Your Group > > > Yahoo! Finance > It's Now Personal > Guides, news, > advice & more. > > Y! Messenger > All together now > Host a free online > conference on IM. > > Y! Groups blog > The place to go > to stay informed > on Groups news! > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >
