http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/companyinfo/eod/Shareholding/shareholding_main.jsp?nds_id=11230&symbol=GUJALKALI&count_string=8%7C10%7C0%7C0%7C0%7C1%7C0%7C1%7C3%7C&as_on_dt=30-SEP-2008
According to this the Govt /State Govt have nominal (NSE claims ZERO) stakes in GACL. Do you have any evidence that GACL was either established / constituted BY (not "under) an Act of Parliament or State Legislature or BY an order / notification of government. If not, forget it. "public authority" is defined in 2(h)of the RTI Act. The leading CIC decision on "public authority" is http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_30112006_12.pdf Sarbajit --- In [email protected], "nityanand jayaraman" <nit...@...> wrote: > > Dear all: > Would like case law from CIC, SIC decisions on when a company is considered > a public authority? Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd, in which Gujarat > Govt has 36 percent stake, claims it is not a public authority. The matter > is coming up for hearing in the Gujarat Information Commission on 3 January, > 2009, after a wait of 18 months. Would appreciate any citations and order > abstracts. > ciao, nity > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
