Dear Mr. Roy: Thanks for your information. But the promoters that are mentioned in the link you gave are all companies set up and/or wholly/partly financed by Gujarat Government. Please see: http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/companyinfo/eod/Shareholding/shareholding_promoters.jsp?nds_id=11230&symbol=GUJALKALI&count_string=8|10|0|0|0|1|0|1|3|&as_on_dt=30-SEP-2008
Does this change things? I will still seek information regarding GACL's formation. ciao, nity On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:05 PM, sroy1947 <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.nseindia.com/marketinfo/companyinfo/eod/Shareholding/shareholding_main.jsp?nds_id=11230&symbol=GUJALKALI&count_string=8%7C10%7C0%7C0%7C0%7C1%7C0%7C1%7C3%7C&as_on_dt=30-SEP-2008 > > According to this the Govt /State Govt have nominal (NSE claims ZERO) > stakes in GACL. > > Do you have any evidence that GACL was either established / > constituted BY (not "under) an Act of Parliament or State Legislature > or BY an order / notification of government. If not, forget it. > > "public authority" is defined in 2(h)of the RTI Act. > > The leading CIC decision on "public authority" is > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_30112006_12.pdf > > Sarbajit > > --- In [email protected] <rti_india%40yahoogroups.com>, "nityanand > jayaraman" <nit...@...> > wrote: > > > > > Dear all: > > Would like case law from CIC, SIC decisions on when a company is > considered > > a public authority? Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd, in which Gujarat > > Govt has 36 percent stake, claims it is not a public authority. The > matter > > is coming up for hearing in the Gujarat Information Commission on 3 > January, > > 2009, after a wait of 18 months. Would appreciate any citations and > order > > abstracts. > > ciao, nity > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
