No, Extra Ordinary Highly Talented Shri 1008 Anugraha Narayan Tiwari Ji with distinctions, is a complete institution in himself is helping PIO. There is nothing wrong in taking deep care and comfort of most honest SEBI officials who are no less than Raja Harishchandra. SEBI, Ministry of Finance, Intelligence Bureau and RBI are close friends who have bred Satyam, Wipro, Megasoft and their learned 5 star auditors. These transparent organizations are all above International experts in expertise. The matter of finance is to small for Extra Ordinary Highly Talented learned IC who provides solution in seconds to most critical problems faced by appellants.
People moving towards bankruptcy, suicide tendency, mental torture as a result of market crash is secondary than comfort of SEBI. Andhra Pradesh bureaucracy and its political regime of Raja Harishchandra fame, Andhra Pradesh Government and Central Government knows very well how to protect Raju Lingam and his close associates. After all he is also human being and a what a big deal if he and his associate have siphoned off public money ? There are also reports of money meant for health care projects with these giants also siphoned off. If lives are lost by legalized activities of highly talented bureaucracy, it is our foolishness. We citizens who aren't supposed to live peacefully are fit to be abused, fit to be tortured, fit to be harassed, fit to be humiliated, fit to be blasted, fit to wait for information for ages, fit to be denied Right information. But history is testimony ... that egoist, people with castles in mid-air, people with fraudulent activities who receives VIP treatment in India are sometime or the other dumped with great humiliation. One who makes pit for other's downfall for his/her luxury and comfort will soon be falling in same pit. If we are sleeping with injustice to our fellow Respectable Citizens ... next number is ours. The prestige and comfort of SEBI officials in senses of Extra Ordinary Highly Talented Shri 1008 Anugraha Narayan Tiwari Ji is supreme. It was indeed people's mistake who invested money in public issues promoted by Government of India. It was people's mistake in United States of America too, who invested in IT Giants with hope of transparency and Goodwill. It was mistake of New York Stock Exchange in Wall Street who could not identify this small fraud of Rs 7000 crores silently bred in Andhra Pradesh. We poor citizens of India with very little education and White House Government too have great things to learn from Extra Ordinary Highly Talented Shri 1008 IC Anugraha Narayan Tiwari Ji with distinction of Harvard Fame who ought to have been in International Court of Justice or United Nations. S. K. Jain At 10:32 AM 1/21/2009, Satish Kumar Kapoor wrote: >CIC is advising CPIO, how particular information does not fall under >their pervies. Mr Tiwari IC in my appeal against SEBI, teaching SEBI >officials, how not to give information or transfer application, >instead of collecting information from stock exchange. Although >section 18 of RTI act says that if any citizen is not able to draft >application for seeking information CIC should help citizen to get >information, in practice ICs are acting quite opposite. > >S.K.Kapoor > >--- On Wed, 1/21/09, C K Jam ><<mailto:rtiwanted%40yahoo.com>[email protected]> wrote: > >From: C K Jam <<mailto:rtiwanted%40yahoo.com>[email protected]> >Subject: [rti_india] Why is CIC so blantantly biased ? >To: <mailto:rti_india%40yahoogroups.com>[email protected] >Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 8:15 PM > ><http://cic.gov.>http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ FAAD_16012009_ 01.pdf > >"Regarding the issues raised by Shri Bhati, it may be worthwhile to >mention that the Commission has no role to give advice to an individual >citizen or to explain the legal position as to whether a particular >autonomous body is a public authority under the RTI Act or not. The >appellant, however, may ask information from the Government >Authority where this autonomous body is registered." > >However, in the Case of Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund (JNMF), >Hon'ble CIC WH himself informed the Vice Chairman of JNMF (DR Karan >Singh) that as per legal opinion of Prof Nigam (legal advisor to >CIC), JNMF was not a PA. >All this was happening while a matter was being heard in the CIC >regarding disclosure of information by JNMF. > >Read the full story and see all original documents at: > ><http://www.rtiindia>http://www.rtiindia .org/forum/ 7206-jnmf- >central-informat ion-commission- suggests- applicant- move-writ- >petition- high-court. html > >Why is CIC being selective in offering "legal advise" ? >Some people more equal than others or is it blatantly biased ? > >RTIwanted [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
