Hi, The K.Lall decision is only on the website of CIC (published after 1 year) because I exposed it. It is a completely illegal decision delivered by IC(ANT) to shield the Registrar of Companies whose records are in a mess. Corporate scandals like Satyam come about because of decisions like these where information is not permitted to be disclosed to citizens.
The answer is not to challenge these in High Courts but before Full Benches of the Commissions. IC(ANT)'s 7(3) "further fees to be determined by CPIO" is listed before Full Bench on 24-Feb-2009 - I have got a hearing notice (for information) on this. Hopefully they will hear me too. The K.Lall incident is a graphic case of misguided senior citizens - habitual and frivolous RTIers - who dont show up for hearings - allowing ICs to pass these anti-citizen orders. In any case the K.Lall decision was drafted by the "winning" Respondent P/A. This group is on the job to rectify / overturn K.Lall - be patient. HERE IS WHAT IC T is shielding RoC from "Ministry makes a mess of key papers filed by 150000 firms" http://www.livemint.com/2009/01/04234154/Ministry-makes-a-mess-of-key-p.html The "Responsible RTI Code" can be found on our homepage http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india Sarbajit B.E.(Hons) BITS Pilani --- In [email protected], sanjiva dayal <sanjivada...@...> wrote: > > Dear Sarabjit, > 1. > Kindly see the following order of CIC which is on the CIC website www.cic.gov.in:- > K. Lall Vs. Ministry of Company Affairs (Appeal No.CIC/AT/A/2007/00112; Date of Decision: 12.4.2007). > Kindly comment whether this order is against the provisions of RTI Act or not. Using this order, CPIO of Registrar of Companies is not providing any information about Companies. > 2. > Scam relates to providing housing loan against fictitious properties on the basis of fake documents by Banks. > 3. > What is your Responsible RTI Code? > > Sanjiva Dayal, B.Tech.(I.I.T. Kanpur)
