Dear All, 1)CIC SG had time & again demanded adequate qualified Staff from Govt . Dopt rejected therefore does it fit in Govt's Norms to refuse staff ? DoPT should have provided staff to CIC like charged expenditure . I believe on 6.1.2009 ( Minutes Of Meetings) CIC sent back proposal to increase Staff to DoPT . Why double speak? . We are with CIC SG if makes an appeal to Citizen to donate generously to CIC as Govt has miserably failed to meet CIC's basic demands. Not only this we are demanding ( alongwith other with other demands) from all political parties to come out in their election manifesto to make adequate provision financial & manpower requirements for RTI & CIC & Centre State Funding 2) Does it fit in CICs norms to direct Hon Supreme Court to furnish property Details without first giving their ( CIC's) own property detials ? Would CIC Wajahat Habibullah reply? regards vihar --- On Mon, 9/3/09, Sidharth <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Sidharth <[email protected]> Subject: [rti_india] Hiring of private staff by Shailesh Gandhi in CIC is Abnormal To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 9 March, 2009, 10:08 AM There's an interesting news item that quotes CIC Sh. Habibullah like this. "Shailesh Gandhi did what is restricted by government rules. You can't do that really. But he has hired someone on his own cost. If he wants to do that, he can do it but its normally not the norm of the government," http://tinyurl. com/avbsq8 If IC SG has indulged in such an abnormal activity flouting norms then CIC should not have allowed him to do this for all these months. There's no point in going to press on these. He should have stopped these activities using powers vested with him when they were started. CIC is equally guilty on this. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
