As reported in times of India Mumbai 29.03.09 regarding meet of RTI activist’s 
on 28.03.09
SIC Ramanand Tiwari statement that even a paltry sum of Rs 5000 or even 
monitory cost to applicants who have gone through such trauma to get 
information cost of applications  traveling costs etc on erring PIO’s ( forget 
about Rs 25,000 ) is harsh on them and should not be imposed on PIO’s because 
they have families,  
This statement is absurd, against natural justice and against the principles of 
the RTI act, the SIC hold their post as SIC equivalent to that  of a Civic 
court or a metropolitan court Judge.The SIC should quit his post for making 
such statements or rather he is a  corrupt Judge (SIC)  as he is making a 
mockery of the RTI act.
In such a case a person who Steals (robs)  or commits murder should be 
acquitted of his/her crime  because he has done so because he too has a family 
who are starving.
And not be sentenced to imprisonment ( Jail term )
These PIO’s families are not starving, many of the PIO’s do not give the 
information
Because the scam will be exposed, or they have God fathers like Politicians who 
will protect them, some of them as reported in news papers being caught 
showering ill gotten wealth  in dance bars. What is the UPA Government doing 
about it? NOTHING 
Because as believed many of them are corrupt and have money in Swiss banks
There is corruption in every Government department, in some cases PIO’s are 
making lakhs of rupees in bribes, as one PIO had the audacity to tell a 
applicant, let the SIC impose Rs 25,000 penalty I will pay it, What does this 
statement means? Any one with common sense will understand the statement.
Even at 2nd appeal hearing when SIC orders the PI0 to make available the 
information within a time frame say 7 days or 15 days, the PIO does not comply, 
complains To SIC u/s sec 18 of RTI act of PIO failing to comply with his orders 
falls on deaf ears, even at this stage of time the PIO is not penalized. RTI 
applications made to PIO of SIC office on progress report ( file notings) on 
complains made under sec 18 of the act the PIO does not reply within the time 
frame
Thus the SIC office itself is setting a bad example  
Ramanand tiwari says that since the issue is being raised he will try and 
impose more penalties in future, in other words he admits that he has been soft 
peddling and not implementing the RTI act  for reasons best known to himself, 
this statement  is just an eye wash to turn down public anger, nothing will 
ever change whether it is CSIC Suresh Joshi or SIC Ramanand Twari, as they know 
too well who will pay them such high salaries with perks etc as they are 
retired Government Servants, if they act tough the politicians will remove them 
from their post, that’s the reason they soft peddle protecting the PIO’s 
interest, as PIO’s are controlled by some powerful Politicians.

Leslie Almeida



      

Reply via email to