Thanks Trivendra saab
 
earlier it happened to me the orders of SIC was not impliminted by SIC so i put 
complain u/s 18 of RTI act, 4 months no response, i then put an application to 
PIO of SIC office
asking for progress report of my complains, it worked, 
you have given me good substance to put to PIO of SIC office
i am a volunter at a helpline at Bandra mumbai for the past 3 years, if they 
can do this to me what more they can do to the common man who puts 2nd appeals 
and has no guidance, its high time theses jokers get kicked out.  activists are 
putting the pressure
 for removal of CSIC Suresh Joshi who is a pawn at the hands of bereaucrats.
 
Rgds
Leslie Almeida
 
 
Rgds
Leslie Almeida
Bandra Mumbai

--- On Sat, 7/4/09, Trivendra <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Trivendra <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] non receipt of orders in 2nd Appeal
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 10:02 PM








Ask fro fixing date of decision taken, parametres, person involving in
decision making, their qualification etc. Also ask if no decision is taken
in the time frame, what consequence they will face.

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Arun Agrawal <arun_agrawal@ yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> Strange and unbelievable, that is all I can say .
>
> Orders lying cold storage since 8 months !!!
>
> I would myself be very glad to understand what might be the next course
> of action, perhaps a complaint to the Honourable Governor .
>
> Arun Agrawal
>
> n rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com <rti_india%40yahoog roups.com> , LESLIE ALMEIDA
> <lesals2000@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear RTI Activists
> >
> > 7 of my 2nd appeal orders at SIC mumbai , judgement given "Decision to
> be taken" some orders are way back in November 2008 could someone advise
> what next course of action should i take as nothing has happened so far,
> >
> > Rgds
> > Leslie Almeida
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to