Dear all,
This is just to clarify, Karnataka had added a new Rule 14 to the existnig
RTI Rules. They have not changed the Act as they do not have the legislative
competence to do so. It is an Act that parliament passed, only Parliament
can amend it. We have strongly opposed Rule 14 from day one. Some activists
in Karnataka like Mr. Y G Muralidhar and his network are amongst the few
people who protested vociferously against this new Rule. I am not aware if
other activists also took up this matter as strongly as Muralidhar and his
group. The funny thing is this Rule has not been table in the legislatrue I
am told. We wanted to oppose it there, however there has been an unusual
delay in its tabling. Sadly the Karnataka Rule has been replicated in
Chhattisgarh recently according to media reports. Some activists have
opposed it there also. but others have not taken it seriously.
My own applications rarely cross the 150-200 words as it is important to be
brief and precise in drafting RTI applications. However that is a personal
standard I have chosen. I do not think it is fair for the government to
impose similar limits through subordinate legislation.
Thanks
Venkat

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of LESLIE ALMEIDA
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:46 AM
To: undisclosed recipients:
Subject: [rti_india] Fw: Karnataka has changed the RTI Act, 2005!


  

Dear RTI Activists

Recently, I was shocked and left speechless to hear
that karnataka has changed the RTI Act, 2005 by enacting their own RTI Act,
2006 in which one can ask only single question or query besides teh words
cannot exceed more then 150 words!
What was more shocking and eeric that it was drafted by the CIC
of Karnataka Mr.Misra(former Chief Secretray) and cleared by
the Karnataka Govt to help hide the illegalities of the
Government besdies sealed the unknown skeletons which would
have tumbled out of the closet! 
 
I hope the trend does not catch up with the Maharashtra or other state
Government! it may come out with one word per application!
however we in Maharashtra specially Mumbai are strong body of activists
who will oppose such move tooth and nail should some thing like this happens
here.

Leslie Almeida






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to