Dear Adv. Chitkara I am extremely grateful for your timely brotherly advice and assure you that henceforth I shall endeavour sticking to restrained pontificating from the lofty heights of my buddhijeevi ivory tower - and in the respectable legal verbiage of "extraneous considerations" et.al in place of "bribes" and "corruption" etc.
Sarbajit --- In [email protected], Rakesh Chitkara <rakesh.chitk...@...> wrote: > > Activism is fine. Yet, there is thin borderline that we sometimes fail to > notice. Moderation in language and tone to lend more respectability to your > message for example. > Judiciary is known to overturning a large no. of decisions of lower > authorities, sensing fullly the extraneous considerations that may have > weighed down in pronouncing irrational decision. > > The restraint however is observed in quashing it. May I apppeal to my > honourable colleague that same thing if stated in a lampooning manner will be > more effective and deadly witty. Others tend to take your views as that of a > serious person without personal bias and prejudics. > > I am positive that the logic of Mr. Sarbajit is 100% correct in terms of law. > I also endorse his view and analysis. And as a colleague on the same side as > he, would urge that he must rise above those small words that tend to pull > him down to an ordinary level from a great motivated activist. > > Regards, > Rakesh Chitkara, Advocate > 9891678009 >
