last order in Delhi High Court I could find was Can somebody please explain this order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7604/2009 UOI and ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. R. Balasubramaniam, Advocate. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR. .. Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R 15.05.2009 C.M.No.6366/2009 Counsel for the applicant states that this is a fresh writ petition filed by a third party involving the same issue as in W.P.(C) No.7604/2009. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. The applicant is at liberty to file a writ petition. SANJIV KHANNA, J. MAY 15, 2009 NA Regards Vikram Bakshi PS CONFIDENCE: Once all village people decided to pray for rain. On the day of prayer all people gathered and only one boy came with an umbrella that's confidence........... TRUST: Trust should be like the feeling of a one year old baby when you throw him in the air, he laughs...... because he knows you will catch him........ HOPE: A human being can live for 40 days without water, 8 minutes without air but not even 1 second without hope.... SO ALWAYS HAVE CONFIDENCE, TRUST OTHERS AND NEVER LOSE HOPE HAVE A FABULOUS DAY!! !!!!!!! --- On Wed, 19/8/09, Arun Agrawal <[email protected]> wrote: From: Arun Agrawal <[email protected]> Subject: [rti_india] RTI Act for Indian Army in J &K To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, 19 August, 2009, 5:52 AM You can look up all Delhi High Court Orders on its website www.delhihighcourt. nic.in <http://www.delhihig hcourt.nic. in> Can anybody confirm what was the High Court decsion in J &K > > > The PIOs in J &K have started using this stay orderto deny information from Army Formation HQ. What is the remedy? > > > IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI > > W.P.(C) 7604/2009, C.M. No. 3739/2009 (Stay Application) > > UOI and ORS. ..... > Petitioners > Through : Col. R. Balasubramanian, Advocate. > > > versus > > CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR. ..... Respondents > Through : Nemo. > > CORAM: > HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT > > O R D E R > 20.03.2009 > > At request of the learned counsel, Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are hereby > deleted from the Memo of Parties. Let amended Memo of Parties be filed within > three days. > Issue notice to Respondent No.2, returnable on 18.08.2009. > Learned counsel for the petitioner points to Section 1 (2) of the Right > to Information Act, 2005 which indicates that it is not applicable to the State > of Jammu and Kashmir. Having considered this submissions and other averments, > the operation of the impugned order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) > dated 03.02.2009 is hereby suspended till the next date of hearing. > > > S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J > MARCH 20, 2009 > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
