--- In [email protected], brando <vikrambaksh...@...> wrote:
>
> sir,
>
> I tried but was not able to get any information,it seems Justice Bhat passed
> two orders on different cases as per web site
>
> Regards
>
> Vikram Bakshi
>
> PS
>
> CONFIDENCE:
>
> Once all village people decided to pray for rain. On the day of prayer all
> people gathered and only one boy came with an
> umbrella that's confidence...........
>
> TRUST:
>
> Trust should be like the feeling of a one year old baby when you throw him in
> the air, he laughs...... because he knows you will catch him........
>
> HOPE:
>
> A human being can live for 40 days without water, 8 minutes without air but
> not even 1 second without hope....
>
>
> SO ALWAYS HAVE CONFIDENCE, TRUST OTHERS AND NEVER LOSE HOPE
>
>
>
> HAVE A FABULOUS DAY!! !!!!!!!
>
> --- On Wed, 19/8/09, Arun Agrawal <arun_agra...@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Arun Agrawal <arun_agra...@...>
> Subject: [rti_india] RTI Act for Indian Army in J &K
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday, 19 August, 2009, 5:52 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You can look up all Delhi High Court Orders on its website
>
> www.delhihighcourt. nic.in <http://www.delhihig hcourt.nic. in>
>
> Can anybody confirm what was the High Court decsion in J &K
> >
> >
> > The PIOs in J &K have started using this stay orderto deny information
> from Army Formation HQ. What is the remedy?
> >
> >
> > IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
> >
> > W.P.(C) 7604/2009, C.M. No. 3739/2009 (Stay Application)
> >
> > UOI and ORS. .....
> > Petitioners
> > Through : Col. R. Balasubramanian, Advocate.
> >
> >
> > versus
> >
> > CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR. ..... Respondents
> > Through : Nemo.
> >
> > CORAM:
> > HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
> >
> > O R D E R
> > 20.03.2009
> >
> > At request of the learned counsel, Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are hereby
> > deleted from the Memo of Parties. Let amended Memo of Parties be filed
> within
> > three days.
> > Issue notice to Respondent No.2, returnable on 18.08.2009.
> > Learned counsel for the petitioner points to Section 1 (2) of the
> Right
> > to Information Act, 2005 which indicates that it is not applicable to
> the State
> > of Jammu and Kashmir. Having considered this submissions and other
> averments,
> > the operation of the impugned order of the Central Information
> Commission (CIC)
> > dated 03.02.2009 is hereby suspended till the next date of hearing.
> >
> >
> > S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J
> > MARCH 20, 2009
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet
> Explorer 8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
