Your underlying assumptions are questionable. By the scheme of the RTI Act 2005, no Public Authority should designate CPIOs "IN" J&K since the Act has no territorial jurisdiction there.
If you are an Indian citizen (albeit resident of J&K) you can lawfully apply to any CPIO of the concerned Public Authority situated OUTSIDE J&K. > --- In [email protected], brando <vikrambakshi67@> wrote: > > > > sir, > > > > I tried but was not able to get any information,it seems Justice Bhat > > passed two orders on different cases as per web site > > > > Regards > > > > Vikram Bakshi > > > > PS > > > > CONFIDENCE: > > > > Once all village people decided to pray for rain. On the day of prayer all > > people gathered and only one boy came with an > > umbrella that's confidence........... > > > > TRUST: > > > > Trust should be like the feeling of a one year old baby when you throw him > > in the air, he laughs...... because he knows you will catch him........ > > > > HOPE: > > > > A human being can live for 40 days without water, 8 minutes without air but > > not even 1 second without hope.... > > > > > > SO ALWAYS HAVE CONFIDENCE, TRUST OTHERS AND NEVER LOSE HOPE > > > > > > > > HAVE A FABULOUS DAY!! !!!!!!! > > > > --- On Wed, 19/8/09, Arun Agrawal <arun_agrawal@> wrote: > > > > > > From: Arun Agrawal <arun_agrawal@> > > Subject: [rti_india] RTI Act for Indian Army in J &K > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Wednesday, 19 August, 2009, 5:52 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can look up all Delhi High Court Orders on its website > > > > www.delhihighcourt. nic.in <http://www.delhihig hcourt.nic. in> > > > > Can anybody confirm what was the High Court decsion in J &K > > > > > > > > > The PIOs in J &K have started using this stay orderto deny information > > from Army Formation HQ. What is the remedy? > > > > > > > > > IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI > > > > > > W.P.(C) 7604/2009, C.M. No. 3739/2009 (Stay Application) > > > > > > UOI and ORS. ..... > > > Petitioners > > > Through : Col. R. Balasubramanian, Advocate. > > > > > > > > > versus > > > > > > CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR. ..... Respondents > > > Through : Nemo. > > > > > > CORAM: > > > HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT > > > > > > O R D E R > > > 20.03.2009 > > > > > > At request of the learned counsel, Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are hereby > > > deleted from the Memo of Parties. Let amended Memo of Parties be filed > > within > > > three days. > > > Issue notice to Respondent No.2, returnable on 18.08.2009. > > > Learned counsel for the petitioner points to Section 1 (2) of the > > Right > > > to Information Act, 2005 which indicates that it is not applicable to > > the State > > > of Jammu and Kashmir. Having considered this submissions and other > > averments, > > > the operation of the impugned order of the Central Information > > Commission (CIC) > > > dated 03.02.2009 is hereby suspended till the next date of hearing. > > > > > > > > > S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J > > > MARCH 20, 2009 > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet > > Explorer 8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
