Dear Mr Singhal and group

Just to check it out, I tried finding the status of my Appeals/Complaints to 
CIC using their interface.

I checked the "both" option and searched by my name "sarbajit"

This is my result:-

"Second Appeal > Name - sarbajit (3)
S.No.   File Number/
Date Submitted/
No.     Submitted By    Public Authority        Status
1.      
CIC/LS/C/2009/000322
08-05-2009
RC/UG/09/f3807ortm      Mr. SARBAJIT ROY        Delhi Development Authority     
Date of Hearing Scheduled
03-09-2009 , 11.00 Hrs.

2.      
04-01-2006
CIC/WB/A/2006/00011     Shri Sarbajit Roy       President Secretariat   
Decision announced

3.      
04-01-2006
CIC/PB/A/2006/00005     Shri Sarbajit Roy       Ministry of Power       Under 
Scrutiny Process
  (Complaint/Appeal Admitted "


MY GROUSES:

A) I have NEVER filed any 2nd Appeal against "President Secretariat" to my 
knowledge, the cited File No. "CIC/WB/A/2006/00011" is actally for my 2nd 
Appeal against DERC.

B) I have never filed any 2nd Appeal/Complaint against "Ministry of Power" 
either. and how a non-existent document can be "under scrutiny" for 4 years 
baffles me.

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected], M K Singhal <mk.sing...@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
> I had been trying find out the status of my complaints/2nd appeals lodged 
> with CIC office on his websitehttp://cic.gov.in/ underCheck Status of RTI 
> Complaints / Appeals’ from time to time in the past. 
> I had submitted the following complaints/2nd appeals pertaining to Employees 
> Provident Fund Organization (Ministry Of Labour & Employment) to CIC office 
> during the last one year:
> Sl# My RTI appln dt My Complaint/
> 2nd appeal dt CIC Diary No CIC File No Status as per CIC website
> Actual Status today (02.10.09) 
> 1 24.12.08 08.04.09 20248 dt 21.04.09 CIC/LS/A/2009/525 dt 11.05.09 â†'Under 
> Scrutiny Process/Complaint/Appeal Admitted
> â†'Actually, both these cases were heard on 21.07.09 and decided. 
> 2 09.02.09 30.05.09 30423 dt 09.06.05 CIC/LS/A/2009/00738 dt 14.07.09 
> 3 18.02.09 08.07.09 Not yet given on website   
> 4 21.05.09 03.09.09 Not yet given on website   
> 5 09.06.09 27.08.09 Not yet given on website   
> It is therefore obvious that CIC is not keeping his website updated and hence 
> it is not providing the desired information to us citizens. Thus not only is 
> the information given against my first two cases as on 02.10.09 wrong, since 
> they were already decided after the hearing held on 21.07.09, the information 
> about the remaining three complaints/2nd appeals submitted by me on 08.07.09, 
> 03.09.09 and 27.08.09 respectively and pending for action in CIC office is 
> not given at all even until today ie  02.10.09.
> I have already written a letter to CIC requesting him to ensure that his 
> website is duly updated from time to time. The members of this group may also 
> like to visit this site and pressurize CIC to ensure that it is updated from 
> time to time. 
> mksinghal
> 
> 
>       Now, send attachments up to 25MB with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how. 
> http://in.overview.mail.yahoo.com/photos
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to