Dear Sarabjit The persons you have named are all prostitutes of RTI and C.I.C is their kotha.
S D Sharma --- In [email protected], Sanjeev Santoshi <sanjs...@...> wrote: > > Hello everybody. > > The schedule for this event is also now published > http://cic.gov.in/convention-2009/programme.htm > > There is no time allocated at all for consultation / hearing the views > of the public. > > --- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <sroy1947@> wrote: > > > > http://cic.gov.in/convention-2009/listofspeakers.htm > > > > Finally, with the publication of this list - and that too at the very last > > minute - the CIC has conceded that it is firmly within the grip of the > > NCPRI RTI mafia. > > > > Each and every non-official speaker connected with RTI at this convention > > inexplicably belongs to the NCPRI "mafia". > > > > Let me name them all here:- > > > > 1) Shekhar Singh > > 2) Medha Patkar > > 3) Venkatesh Nayak > > > > Is this what the CIC means by its section 4(1)(b)(vii) disclosure ?? > > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Section4/Section-4-1-b-vii.pdf > > > > "Consultation with the members of the Public > > > > 1. Interaction with civil society and public already exists - either > > through the electronic mails or through "feedback". Commission does receive > > the view points through both these means. > > > > 2. The Civil Society/NGOs' views are placed before the Convention every > > year and its recommendations, if any, to be passed on to the Government for > > appropriate action. > > > > 3. Individual Comments are welcome. These issues are examined and > > are taken up at the Annual Convention if deemed fit." > > > > THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TO TELL MR HABIBULLAH:- > > > > If you MUST organise these conventions for the limited benefit of > > particular NGO then please do so with your personal funds and not ours. > > >
