Dear Sarbajit and other group members,

I do not concur that the 6th principle is made up of 3 parts or that
it can be separated from the other 5 either.

There are numerous classes of information which can be accessed by RTI
method which does not come in the way of  a Government's functioning.
What this principle really stands for is to exhort the citizen RTI
clients

a) to be patriotic, ** AND **
b) not to obstruct working of Government by allowing access to file
notings of honest and efficient officers which ensures their
victimisation (transfers / media / trumped up charge sheets etc.) as
the consequence..

Ashish

> > "vi) To appreciate that the "Right to Information" ought not to be used
> > by patriotic citizens so as to obstruct the working of their
> > Government, or to victimise honest and efficient officers etc. by
> > allowing access to "file notings"."




--- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <sroy1...@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Vickram
>
> You and Satishji have raised some very important issues which I shall attempt 
> to address.
>
> 1) The latest "poll" is for voting upon by members of this group only. No 
> "outsourcing". If our members are concerned enough to mobilise votes for 
> their POV it is a healthy development and ensures wider acceptability of the 
> final result /outcome. The reason that polled votes are visible immediately 
> after a member casts his vote is to ensure transparency in the process AND to 
> give an option to change his mind till the poll closes. I can assure you that 
> PRIVACY is maintained and your own vote is secret.
>
> 2) This group has evolved (over time) into a "national" group focussed on 
> "Central" RTI. We warmly welcome constant interaction with other Yahoo groups 
> which focus on State issues and RTI implementation there.
>
> 3) I think it is very positive if a few important mails from this group are 
> forwarded to other Yahoo RTI groups. I agree that it should not clog up email 
> boxes of members there, but at the end of the day it is for those Moderators 
> (like Ms K Chamraj) to control their group's postings.
>
> 4) I agree with Mr Satish that there are actually 3 issues contained in that 
> 1 principle. The question being polled now is simply to discard the principle 
> entirely or to accept it entirely. I am reminded of an old legal proverb 
> "False in one means false in all". Simply put, this means everyone may vote 
> for deletion of the entire principle even if they disagree with just one of 
> its components.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- In [email protected], Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Moderators of RTI Group,
> > Thanks for this Mail , So you have oputsourced The Group and its Poll and 
> > the Messages related to the poll to another Yahoo group. Constantly I am 
> > reminding this Group which carries Each and every message in rti_india 
> > group virtually clogging in boxes and repeting all and sundry . When i 
> > wrote to them these moderators stated that it will deprive them and their 
> > group members of Information .
> > NOW , What are achiving by Posting an Very limited Poll meant for one group 
> > along with Messages Related to that poll . Arguably they may say since we 
> > are members of this Group , you are Depriving our members of the poll also .
> > Is this not a blunder .
> > I hope rti_india group Moderators will think of some method's to ensure our 
> > privacy of the poll is retained at least till the Polling period , this is 
> > just like prepoll survey
> >
> > N vikramsimha , Trustee RTI Study Centre &KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N 
> > Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.
> >
> > --- On Thu, 29/10/09, Kathyayini Chamaraj <kchamaraj@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Kathyayini Chamaraj <kchamaraj@>
> > Subject: [kria] Fwd: [rti_india] New poll for rti_india
> > To: "kria" <[email protected]>
> > Date: Thursday, 29 October, 2009, 8:29 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsatish@ yahoo.com>
> > Date: Oct 29, 2009 7:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] New poll for rti_india
> > To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > There are three issues involved in this clause.
> >
> > 1) use of RTI to obstruct working of Govt
> >
> > 2) Use of RTI to victimise honest officers
> >
> > 3) File notings
> >
> > 1. Use of RTI to obstruct working of Govt is very tricky issue, every RTI
> > application seeking information can be termed as " obstructing working of
> > Govt" particularly where vested interests of corrupt officers are
> > involved.How group will define, whether particular issue or information
> > being sought is obstructing work of Govt or not.I CAN FIND EXECUSES AND
> > ARGUMENTS IN EVERY APPLICATION UNDER RTI ACT, OBSTRUCTING WORKING OF GOVT.
> >
> > 2. I agree that RTI should not be used to victimise honest officers.
> >
> > 3. File notings are integeral part of decision making disclosure of which
> > cannot be termed as obstructing working of Govt or victimising honest
> > officers.
> >
> > I thing we can discuss three issues seperatelly and seek voting.
> >
> > Satish
> > ------------ --------- ---------
> > *From:* "rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com" <rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com>
> > *To:* rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com
> > *Sent:* Thu, October 29, 2009 1:12:56 AM
> > *Subject:* [rti_india] New poll for rti_india
> >
> > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> > rti_india group:
> >
> > I vote to delete principle 6 from this group's Code for Ethical RTIers.
> >
> > The principle reads as follows:
> >
> > "vi) To appreciate that the "Right to Information" ought not to be used
> > by patriotic citizens so as to obstruct the working of their
> > Government, or to victimise honest and efficient officers etc. by
> > allowing access to "file notings"."
> >
> > VOTE: YES to delete this clause, NO to retain it, UNDECIDED if no opinion.
> >
> > o YES
> > o NO
> > o UNDECIDED
> >
> > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/rti_ india/surveys?
> > id=12957245<http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/rti_ india/surveys? id=12957245>
> >
> > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> > web site listed above.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >       Keep up with people you care about with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how. 
> > http://in.overview.mail.yahoo.com/connectmore
> >
>

Reply via email to