Dear Monoj,
This is what I said earlier that I am asking them which are all VISSISTA
DASTAVEJs.
They are trying to dodge me but I know they cannot do for long.

Thanks,
Yours in service for RTI
Bhaskar

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Manoj Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>   Of course, I know what it means. But have they laid down the norms,
> while doing the classifications & indexing of the records u/s 4(1)(a)? Thats
> what I was referring to
>
> Manoj
>
> --- On *Tue, 6/1/10, Bhaskar Prabhu <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Bhaskar Prabhu <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: DoPT OM on the kinds of fee chargeable under
> Section 7(3) of the RTI Act in
>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 11:30 PM
>
>
>
>  Vissista dastavej means spl documents. Circulars can be Marathi.
> Bhaskar Prabhu
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Manoj Pai <manoj...@yahoo. 
> com<http://us.mc308.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>     " But MCGM has worded the circular in Marathi "visshista dastavej" -
>>
>>
>> Have they completed Section 4(1)(a) of the RTI Act? Maybe this should be
>> able to help you decide if "visshista dastavej" is correct or wrong.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Manoj
>>
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 6/1/10, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@ 
>> gmail.com<http://us.mc308.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
>> >* wrote:
>>
>>
>>   Dear Sunil,
>>
>> This is  what we all need to do and my complaint order is still awaited
>> which is pending after hearing from March 2009 and after this I was able to
>> convince the MCGM to take out circular regarding charges and way document to
>> be given by Municipal Corporation of Mumbai i.e  they should stamp as
>> document provided under RTI and name of the offier should also be written.
>> But MCGM has worded the circular in Marathi "visshista dastavej" - means spl
>> documents (which is vague) be charged as per price fixed by department ( now
>> I am telling them give me list of all spl documents). So here there is
>> hitch. After order from Joshi if tit is negative then I am left ony
>> perceiving to GAD or  go to High Court.
>>
>> Yours in service for RTI
>> Bhaskar Prabhu
>> Mahiti Adhikar Manch
>> Mumbai
>>
>>
>>
>
> 
>

Reply via email to