Thanks. Yours in service for RTI
Bhaskar On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:10 PM, sarbajitr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Bhaskar > > 1) You are absolutely correct that I am nobody to ask why you > file so many RTIs. > > 2) You are however incorrect when you impute that I have called YOU a > 'harami'. > > 3) You are also incorrect by imputing that I have a personal grudge against > Shailesh Gandhi. Mr Gandhi is now a public servant. It is not an offence to > honestly criticise his performance as a public servant or the decisions / > reasonings he delivers- it is one of the 10 allowable exemptions So if I say > that Shailesh Gandhi is a retard because he does not know the difference > between "benches" and "offices" I have every right to say so and so do you. > > 4) In so far as NCPRI is concerned, the position is very well stated. > This group, of which I am (one of) the Moderator(s), is for CITIZENS. It is > not for 'harami's who claim to be representing citizens ("NGOs"). Every > citizen member here (incl. you) is allowed to freely post essentially > without moderation / censorship and the results are publicly viewable across > the globe in Real Time. I doubt if you can name me any comparable RTI group > which allows the same facility. As Moderator I have set up a fully automated > rule based Yahoo filter which weeds out posts which would disturb our group > members. The criteria is known to everyone here. For example Mr M.K.Singhal > of > Ghaziabad's posts are not weeded out once he has self moderated > his posting to our group > > 5) My message to everyone these days is to "self moderate" their > RTIing. Give other people a chance. RTIing becomes an addiction for some > people usually the frustrated people. No RTI addict will admit > that he is high on this drug. There are also so many RTI pushers > to keep users hooked on RTI to feed off them (vampires). > > 6) Finally, on NCPRI, does NCPRI have even 1 internet forum where > non-members can openly interact with them ? Like any cults they > know they can only get away with their brainwashing behind closed > doors and with a chorus of addicted users. > > Sarbajit > > --- In [email protected] <rti_india%40yahoogroups.com>, Bhaskar > Prabhu <mahitiadhikarma...@...> wrote: > > > > Dear Sarbajit, > > > > Your are nobody to ask me why I have filed 350 applications, this > statement > > I am not giving with anger for your eagered enquiry. Nor I am interested > to > > give explanations here to you and to the board. > > > > Have you imagined the reason for the non informatory situation just > because > > of MISUSE OF POWER SEAT BY bureaucracy/politicians who may be termed as > > NAMAK HARAMS for information which was not shared, so RTI came in to > > existance. Even even today Section 4 is not full filled. Though there is > no > > necessary to say here, just for your information I have not filed a > single > > application for personal matters. All the information I take, eighther I > do > > the Work Social Audit or try to change the system of record maintenance > by > > suggestions. Regarding blocking up the information commissions i have > > appealed to Information commsiions only for two cases, rest as i said > > information i procured from public authority with persuation. I generally > > call for departmental enquiry with in the system if information not given > by > > officers as RTI is work rule.. > > > > It is the Information Commissions which is not doing the clearance of > > appeals, you may have your own opinion about Mr Shailesh Gandhi, for our > > group we feel he has shown the best performance, your message show a > feeling > > of personal grudge against Mr. Shailesh Gandhi, NCPRI etc, so you are in > > habit doing round and round and bringing his name/NCPRI but we are not > > worried of your this habit but as we also consider you of emenace > knowledge > > and appreciate. Though we all have knowledge I thank you for filling more > > by sharing knowledge from your comments on the board > > > > People like us who you are calling as haramis also campaign RTI in trains > > when we travel long distance and train the passengers in trains for RTI > and > > also see that the contractors who supply food in trains are brought books > we > > have done this many a times. People like us who are called haramis by you > > try our level best to see that contractors are penalised for non > > performance and so on. So we are really haramis for the people who fool > the > > country and citizens. > > > > I generally post very less on the board. > > > > Thanks for appreciation and I also appreciate Mr. Shailesh Gandhi if he > has > > filed 800 application under RTI before becomming IC > > > > Yours in service for RTI, > > > > Bhaskar Prabhu > > Convenor > > Mahiti Adhikar Manch > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:48 AM, sarbajitr <sroy1...@...> wrote: > > > > >
