Friends,I present a live case before u. It started with 
my putting forth a small statement- ""A Lt General accused of molesting a
 Colonel's wife is thrown out of Army. Ye kya ho raha hai?" on the 
social networking site Facebook. To this there were different answers 
but the one that really stunned me was from a friend w...hose
 view was that- " No man can molest a woman , and that too a married 
woman of force ... NEVER , without her willing consent". He also says 
that - "I have always observed ... that this type of stupid behaviour is
 common in love affairs".
It is this statement by an otherwise 
learned and sober person that I want to present before you all for 
discussion and opinion making. To me the person who made the statement 
is not important, nor is my idea to criticize him or to dissect his 
background. To me what really matters is the fact that even today, in 
the 21st Century, there is a male perception that goes on to say that 
molestation of a woman (particularly a married woman) is not possible 
(without her consent). If slightly extended this statement comes to mean
 that molestation, rape and such other lurid and heinous crimes against 
women are simply not possible as long as the women are not a party to 
it. Frankly I not only completely disagree with this statement but also 
find it absolutely sickening. And also terrifying. Terrifying because it
 is this kind of male mind-set that is responsible for many heinous and 
dangerous crimes against women go completely unheard and unpunished. 
What this gentleman is saying might as well be the mental thought 
process of the Judge or the Magistrate who has been given the 
responsibility of delivering Justice. And if the person has already made
 a presumption that there can't be a crime of this nature against a 
woman (more so in the case of married women), then one can understand 
what kind of justice is the woman going to get from the concerned court.
We

 have seen the dramatic version of these situations in the celebrated 
film "Damini" where "Taarikh pe taarikh" could not give justice to the 
raped woman till the very end. We also know of such widely discussed 
cases on rape like the Mathura rape case and Bhanwari Devi case where 
victim had to pass through such insulting times even in the law courts 
that it led to great revolt and resistance by the women activists from 
all over India. But it seems that no change of law and regulations on 
Rape has been able to actually change the deep-rooted antipathy of this 
kind of people for whom women are nothing more than a plaything.
If 
what these people say is true then what is the need of any law on Rape? 
Why have different sections on women abuse and molestation? I am not 
commenting at all on the case related with the Lt Genera in the Army 
where he lost his job due to the allegations made by a Colonel's wife. 
Each case is different and must be treated so. I also don't say that 
women don't feign wrong abuse. In my husband Amitabh ji's policing 
career, I have myself come across such cases where it was clear that the
 woman is making false accusations. I remember a case in Gagaha police 
station in Gorakhpur, when my husband was very new in the service and 
after a raid that he had conducted, the woman whom they had arrested 
with weapons had made written accusations of rape against 10-12 police 
officers, except luckily my husband. The matter got exposed within a day
 or two but it had given my husband a lot of mental harassment.
But 
then to sweepingly generalize such a statement is really too much. In my
 opinion it shows the poor mental outlook and extremely biased world 
view of many of the male folk. It also gives the reason why still 
justice is being denied to one half of the human population in such a 
large measure.
I as a social activist and a gender-rights activist 
not only strongly condemn such wrongly-placed mental outlook but also 
consider them extremely dangerous for the proper development and 
functioning of human society in a just manner. I know that such a 
statement by an individual is not really important, what actually counts
 is the overall gender perception. And this statement somehow seems to 
represent the same distorted gender perception

Dr Nutan Thakur,
Secretary,
IRDS,

Lucknow
#
 94155-34525


Reply via email to