Well, we all know that the majority of Rape Cases (Three out of every Four) are actually FALSE (consensual sex etc) and are actually filed to earn Rs 200000/- free Govt Money (as per the Latest rules) given to the so called victims for filing a False Rape Case as till date there is NO punsihment for filing a False Rape Case.
In fact a Pune Police Report States that 74% rape cases lodged since 2008 were actually consensual sex based on marriage promises that were broken later, says police internal report http://www.punemirror.in/index.aspx?page=article§id=62&contentid=201004282010042800020376672f460c5§xslt SC has also ruled that consensual sex is NOT rape. http://www.hindu.com/2007/08/29/stories/2007082961551600.htm So when MHA invited comments and tried to change Rape laws vide http://mha.nic.in/writereaddata/12700472381_CriminalLaw(Amendment)Bill2010.pdf Lots of NGOs started writing back on the same. TOI also published the news. ========== Reactions from men have ranged from apprehensions that such a law could be used to extort money, to outright panic that the doors would be thrown open for false cases that destroy a person's reputation. Rajesh Kumar, a Delhi-based lawyer and "men's rights activist", posted a copy of the bill for discussion on the internet and said it had elements which made it "patently anti-men". Kumar worried that the nuances of the law could be used to file false cases against men even if a sexual relationship was consensual. He also said that the law was gender discriminatory as it recognized only sexual assault of women by men and not the other way around. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Draft-bill-puts-sexual-assault-on-a-par-with-rape/articleshow/5960372.cms ============ And yes, u guessed it right. RTIs have been filed so that the new Rape Law promoting False Cases by giving 200000 to the so called victims goes nowhere. --- In [email protected], "captainjohann" <bjsamuhan...@...> wrote: > > Dear Dr.Thakur, > The case in question is under investigation but as you rightly said the > attitude of some MCPs can be sickening.But then the real cause is also is > false accusations by some women and jumping in by some Human rights > activists. Like the case of World economic forum pointed out by THiruvendra > is a honey trap set by South african mafia for the judge. But what was the > need for Mrs.Advani who was chairman of Women's welfare airdashing to Mumbai > to investigate the case and supporting the woman. Recently is the case of an > airhostess of Jet airways who was living in with a copilot for nearly 3 years > and suddenly accusing him of rape because that guy refused to marry her.He > can be accused of cheating but then calling it rape by all national dailies > makes mockery of rape charge. > Now coming back to Ruchika case and molestation.Though I am not privy to > information, I am almost certain this is a case of rape but "molestation" > charge was framed by the parents of the girl to save her virginity for the > sake of marriage.This is a common phenomenon in India where parents of girls > who are minor try to save her virginity for future marriage after rape. I > think this IS THE BIGGEST SOCIAL EVIL AND THIS FEAR ABOUT LOSING VIRGINITY IS > WHAT ALL SOCIAL ACTIVISTS LIKE YOU SHOULD ADDRESS. It is this VIRGINITY FEAR > which has made Indian law Ministry to draft the new Rape law where > "molestation' is punishable upto 8 years, while attempt to rape wherein > penetration doesnot happen is punishable only by 2 years!!!!!!!Is it not > height of hypocrisy? > > --- In [email protected], Trivendra <trivendra54@> wrote: > > > > Madam, > >  > > As such I agree with you competely, But I would like to remind you case of > > World Economic Forum meeting in Mumbai sometimes in year 2003-2005, and > > arrest of Chief Justice Mr Desai of an African Country (Which I could not > > recall now) on false allegation of rape. > >  > > The coin has always two sides. > > > > > > Trivendra > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Nutan Thakur <nutanthakurlko@> wrote: > > > > > > From: Nutan Thakur <nutanthakurlko@> > > Subject: [rti_india] Molestation > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Sunday, 6 June, 2010, 9:20 AM > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > I present a live case before u. It started with my putting forth a small > > statement- ""A Lt General accused of molesting a Colonel's wife is thrown > > out of Army. Ye kya ho raha hai?" on the social networking site Facebook. > > To this there were different answers but the one that really stunned me was > > from a friend w...hose view was that- " No man can molest a woman , and > > that too a married woman of force ... NEVER , without her willing consent". > > He also says that - "I have always observed ... that this type of stupid > > behaviour is common in love affairs". > > It is this statement by an otherwise learned and sober person that I want > > to present before you all for discussion and opinion making. To me the > > person who made the statement is not important, nor is my idea to criticize > > him or to dissect his background. To me what really matters is the fact > > that even today, in the 21st Century, there is a male perception that goes > > on to say that molestation of a woman (particularly a married woman) is not > > possible (without her consent). If slightly extended this statement comes > > to mean that molestation, rape and such other lurid and heinous crimes > > against women are simply not possible as long as the women are not a party > > to it. Frankly I not only completely disagree with this statement but also > > find it absolutely sickening. And also terrifying. Terrifying because it is > > this kind of male mind-set that is responsible for many heinous and > > dangerous crimes against women go completely unheard and unpunished. What > > this > > gentleman is saying might as well be the mental thought process of the > > Judge or the Magistrate who has been given the responsibility of delivering > > Justice. And if the person has already made a presumption that there can't > > be a crime of this nature against a woman (more so in the case of married > > women), then one can understand what kind of justice is the woman going to > > get from the concerned court. > > We have seen the dramatic version of these situations in the celebrated > > film "Damini" where "Taarikh pe taarikh" could not give justice to the > > raped woman till the very end. We also know of such widely discussed cases > > on rape like the Mathura rape case and Bhanwari Devi case where victim had > > to pass through such insulting times even in the law courts that it led to > > great revolt and resistance by the women activists from all over India. But > > it seems that no change of law and regulations on Rape has been able to > > actually change the deep-rooted antipathy of this kind of people for whom > > women are nothing more than a plaything. > > If what these people say is true then what is the need of any law on Rape? > > Why have different sections on women abuse and molestation? I am not > > commenting at all on the case related with the Lt Genera in the Army where > > he lost his job due to the allegations made by a Colonel's wife. Each case > > is different and must be treated so. I also don't say that women don't > > feign wrong abuse. In my husband Amitabh ji's policing career, I have > > myself come across such cases where it was clear that the woman is making > > false accusations. I remember a case in Gagaha police station in Gorakhpur, > > when my husband was very new in the service and after a raid that he had > > conducted, the woman whom they had arrested with weapons had made written > > accusations of rape against 10-12 police officers, except luckily my > > husband. The matter got exposed within a day or two but it had given my > > husband a lot of mental harassment. > > But then to sweepingly generalize such a statement is really too much. In > > my opinion it shows the poor mental outlook and extremely biased world view > > of many of the male folk. It also gives the reason why still justice is > > being denied to one half of the human population in such a large measure. > > I as a social activist and a gender-rights activist not only strongly > > condemn such wrongly-placed mental outlook but also consider them extremely > > dangerous for the proper development and functioning of human society in a > > just manner. I know that such a statement by an individual is not really > > important, what actually counts is the overall gender perception. And this > > statement somehow seems to represent the same distorted gender perception > > > > Dr Nutan Thakur, > > Secretary, > > IRDS, > > Lucknow > > # 94155-34525 > > >
