Dear All, I had faced one my own case. In this case I was just going to defend my self by counter arguing the say of Advocate. I was kept remian silent by showing Judge's hand to sit down. What ever the words spoke by Advocate, can not be written in this group, was written in Judgement!!! All the words derogative to me personally. But totally wrong !!!!! This is position of our JUdiciary. C A Shah D J
________________________________ From: virender johar <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 9:17:29 AM Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case Dear Leslie, My heartiest congratulations. I have been fighting various cases not only for my self but others and success certainly gives u encouragement. regretablly Judges in India especially in Quasi Judicial matters by Registrar Co-operative Societies one is not sure how they behave.and whether they will sell themselves before Advocates??? Regards, Col V K Johar On 27 August 2010 18:23, LESLIE ALMEIDA <[email protected]> wrote: >u/s 32 of the Advocates act one need not be represented by a lawyer, one can >argue his/her case >many citizens are fighting their own cases however they make study on the >subject matter, search enging like google and bing are very useful, I fought a >case on my own against two opposite lawyers and won >this gave me a boost to my morale. >lawyers have no time to make case studies/judgements, they pratice in court >and >then in the evening attend to clients? good money, no time to learn things.as >of >date there are very few trusted lawyers >the fees are absorbedent and sometimes if the opposite party have money power >they are brought over due to greed and they will sell u for a song. written >without prejudice as they are some good lawyers who cannot be brought.as of >date >i am fighting another appeal case on my own strength. >i had a bitter experience regarding property matter to send a legal notice he >said Rs 1000 >plus expenses postage charges etc, i just needed a "will" from a party who was >not parting with same after receiving it he demands Rs 5000 as fees utter >blackmail, i did not pay him .told him to keep it under his pillow and sleep >over it. got it through through other source. > >Mr Leslie Almeida >Mumbai >, > > > > >
