Dear all,

Times of India dated 27-08=2010 in its first page carried a news item captioned 
" 5 Judges in AP  caught copying in their LLM exams" Not to speak of the large 
numbers who escaped, who paid examiners to close their eyes and so on ! Now 
this being the ramifications do we need any further explanations to the quality 
of judgments, how they are weighed and so on!  
All those who initiate their actions assertively and aggressively had, at the 
back of our mind that "yes in the event of repercussions we have an honourable 
Justice system to turn to" has instilled a state of hopelessness! Now where do 
we go from here!

Corruption and greed has encompassed each and every  strata of our 
administration, except God ?

Iyer GA 
Iyer  

--- On Sat, 28/8/10, Dipak Shah <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Dipak Shah <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, 28 August, 2010, 4:37 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      Dear All,
                I had faced one my own case. In this case I was just going to 
defend my self by counter arguing the say of Advocate. I was kept remian silent 
by showing Judge's hand to sit down. What ever the words spoke by Advocate, can 
not be written in this group, was written in Judgement!!!
                    All the words derogative to me personally. But totally 
wrong !!!!!
This is position of our  JUdiciary.
C A Shah D J
 





From: virender johar <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 9:17:29 AM
Subject: Re: [rti_india] No need to appoint advocate to argue your own case

  



Dear Leslie, 
 
My heartiest congratulations. I have been fighting various cases not only for 
my self but others and success certainly gives u encouragement. regretablly 
Judges in India especially in Quasi Judicial matters  by Registrar 
Co-operative  Societies one is not sure how they behave.and whether they will 
sell themselves before Advocates??? 
 
Regards, 
 
Col V K Johar 


 
On 27 August 2010 18:23, LESLIE ALMEIDA <[email protected]> wrote:


  






u/s 32 of the Advocates act one need not be represented by a lawyer, one can 
argue his/her case
many citizens are fighting their own cases however they make  study on the 
subject matter, search enging like google and bing are very useful, I fought a 
case on my own against two opposite lawyers  and won
this gave me a boost to my morale.
lawyers have no time to make case studies/judgements, they pratice in court and 
then in the evening attend to clients? good money, no time to learn things.as 
of date there are very few trusted lawyers
the fees are absorbedent and sometimes if the opposite party have money power 
they are brought over due to greed and they will sell u for a song. written 
without prejudice as they are some good lawyers who cannot be brought.as of 
date i am fighting another appeal case on my own strength.
i had a bitter experience regarding property matter to send a legal notice he 
said Rs 1000
plus expenses postage charges etc, i just needed a "will" from a party who was 
not parting with same after receiving it he demands Rs 5000 as fees utter 
blackmail, i did not pay him .told him to keep it under his pillow and sleep 
over it. got it through through other source.
 
Mr Leslie Almeida
Mumbai
,



 








    
     

    
    


 



  





Reply via email to