Tomasz Motylewski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Ian Kluft wrote:
>
> > Just in case this isn't already planned... I'd like to bring up the idea
> > with the RT Linux project coordinators to submit the RTL kernel patches
> > into the Linux kernel core after the experimental 2.3 branch is created.
>
> I think, this is very essential thing to do. It is good not only for the
> RT-Linux, but also for the rest of the Linux kernel. All those talks about
> interrupt latency on linux-kernel... I would dream about stardard serial
> driver using RT interrupts, being able to schedule events with 1e-5 s
> reliability in other drivers.
>
> But take care. If Linus likes it too much, he will redesign the whole kernel
> again. :-)
Thats exactly what he should already do.
Nonpreemtive kernel is not a good choice.
The horrible thing about busy-loop for waits less that 1ms in the normal
kernel
on 450MHz processors....
--
Linux is like a wigwam - no windows, no gates, apache inside!
Zdenek Kabelac http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kabi/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
