>
> - use RTLinux and port my application , but this could prove difficult because
> of poor level of real-time features provided by RTLinux(compared to RTOSx) or
> - still continue to use RTOSx (leaving my application as is) and adapt it to
> Linux (ie adapting what has been done with RTLinux...)
In the past I've used VRTX, Intels RMX, HP's so called RTE, dos-based RTOS, and
rt-linux. Of all of those, the set of features provided in rt-linux and linux has
been the simplest to develope, debug, and very configurable to my applications. VRTX
had more features which I had no use for, RMX was terrible in most every way, HP's
RTE (Real Time executive) Wasn't, and the dos stuff didn't take advantage of the
system as it could have and didn't have a good interface with the program development
environment. I've found rt-linux to have an excellent coupling with the development
environment and to user-level linux programs.
It can require a different approch to take advantage of it's strengths.
Best regards,
W. Wright
-------------------------------------------------->-+
C.W. Wright,[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ph:757-824-1698
Fax: 757-824-1036,
NASA,Goddard Space Flight Center
Code 972, Wallops Flight Facility
Wallops Island, Va. 23337
-------+-<-------------------------------------------
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
