On Tue, 25 May 1999, Paolo Mantegazza wrote:
> Linux architecture is lagging far behind QNX. It is in fact standard
> UNIX "a la Back", i.e. late 60s early 70s technology,
Could you give some references that contain somewhat more detail: what are
the ``Backward'' features of Linux? What are the modern counterparts? Why
are they better? Etc.
Will Linux ever become a ``modern'' Unix? If not, does that compromise its
future evolution?
Herman
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Stanford University
Mechanical Engineering, PMA Computer Science, Robotics Lab
<http://www.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc>
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
