Michel Doyon wrote:
>
> Ales,
>
> I am deeply involved in such a project right now. I know Real Time
> Workshop pretty well and what you are suggesting is exactly what I am
> trying to do ... right now ! I have been spending a signifcant amount of
> time to verify the performance of RTAI and RTL and my goal is to automate
> the process of starting from a simulink diagram to a loadable module.
>
> although you can do it with a TLC , I believe that all that is really
> required to do is to modify the grt_main.c into something that will be
> compatible with RT Linux.
>
> You can contact me for more information if you need.
>
> Michel
We (DIAPM) have done a few simple checks on that, against the code
generated for their DSP.
It is not too complex to get a to a code, either kernel or used space,
from the Simulink generated C code.
My idea is that you can save a lot of money by using RTL/RTAI in place
of their costly DSP. Performances can be even better.
Ciao, Paolo.
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
