On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
'core' may be a disadvantageous name....perhaps configure tries to delete 'core'-files from segfauled processes etc...
Yes, there are some code about this in configure. What to do? Do you have a better name at hand?
rtnet-core
Mmh, then we end up with the RTAI 3.0 way: rtnet-xxx or rtnet_xxx. What about "stack"? I think this also hits the mark.
Due to our longer discussion, I'm actually wondering if we shouldn't create a rtnet-developer mailing list soon. I mean, before the first users unsubscribe... ;)
Jan
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
