On 3/24/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Teresa Noviello wrote:
> ...
> (here i do 'rtnet stop')
>
> [ 382.609734] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> 6b6b6b6b
> [ 382.610408] printing eip:
> [ 382.610624] e0d4cbe1
> [ 382.610626] *pde = 00000000
> [ 382.610847] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> [ 382.611039] PREEMPT
> [ 382.611331] Modules linked in: tdma rtmac rtcfg rtcap rt_loopback
> rt_eepro100 rtpacket rtipv4 rtnet rtai_rtdm rtai_sem rtai_lxrt rtai_up
> rtai_hal shpchp piix ide_scsi
> [ 382.613653] CPU: 0
> [ 382.613654] EIP: 0060:[<e0d4cbe1>] Not tainted VLI
> [ 382.613681] EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.15rtai3)
> [ 382.614291 ] EIP is at tdma_detach+0x91/0x200 [tdma]
> [ 382.614511] eax: 6b6b6b6b ebx: 6b6b6b6b ecx: df1d9910 edx: 00000000
> [ 382.614736] esi: df5bb984 edi: df1d9300 ebp: 00000000 esp: deab1e80
Is this issue still persisting after the *all* SVN updates (specifically
in tdma_module.c)? It looks so much like the one I fixed three days ago.
Or is this just due to the delayed approval of this mail for the list
(due to size limitations)?
Jan
It's the problem you fixed three days ago still persisting. The two hosts have been updated to 21 march svn version, on evening and 22 march morning.
The one that gives this problem is that of 21 march svn version, on evening.
But NOW, thanks to this SVN snaphots, we can communicate, even if there is this segmentation fault in rtnet stop phase in one host.
Tery
--
Teresa Noviello
Chiedersi Sempre:"Avro' il tempo di rifarlo?"
