Teresa Noviello wrote: > On 3/24/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Teresa Noviello wrote: >>> ... >>> (here i do 'rtnet stop') >>> >>> [ 382.609734] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address >>> 6b6b6b6b >>> [ 382.610408] printing eip: >>> [ 382.610624] e0d4cbe1 >>> [ 382.610626] *pde = 00000000 >>> [ 382.610847] Oops: 0000 [#1] >>> [ 382.611039] PREEMPT >>> [ 382.611331] Modules linked in: tdma rtmac rtcfg rtcap rt_loopback >>> rt_eepro100 rtpacket rtipv4 rtnet rtai_rtdm rtai_sem rtai_lxrt rtai_up >>> rtai_hal shpchp piix ide_scsi >>> [ 382.613653] CPU: 0 >>> [ 382.613654] EIP: 0060:[<e0d4cbe1>] Not tainted VLI >>> [ 382.613681] EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.15rtai3) >>> [ 382.614291] EIP is at tdma_detach+0x91/0x200 [tdma] >>> [ 382.614511] eax: 6b6b6b6b ebx: 6b6b6b6b ecx: df1d9910 edx: >> 00000000 >>> [ 382.614736] esi: df5bb984 edi: df1d9300 ebp: 00000000 esp: >> deab1e80 >> >> Is this issue still persisting after the *all* SVN updates (specifically >> in tdma_module.c)? It looks so much like the one I fixed three days ago. >> Or is this just due to the delayed approval of this mail for the list >> (due to size limitations)? >> >> Jan >> >> >> >> > It's the problem you fixed three days ago still persisting. The two hosts > have been updated to 21 march svn version, on evening and 22 march morning. > The one that gives this problem is that of 21 march svn version, on evening. > > But NOW, thanks to this SVN snaphots, we can communicate, even if there is > this segmentation fault in rtnet stop phase in one host. >
Just to avoid misunderstanding due to date-based svn revisioning: is your check-out based on revision *968* or higher? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
