Jan Kiszka wrote: > Nadym Salem wrote: >> But my negative error code does not help me in any way now. >> rt_dev_close() fails and therefore I'm having trouble using the same >> program more than once ;) > > Oops, sorry (RTFM - read the fine mail...). Indeed, -524 means > -ENOTSUPP, and this error code is only returned in the asymmetric > closure case. > > But that is actually broken in itself. Such a high error code should not > leak into userland, and we would run better with returning -ENOSYS. That > would trigger an automatic context switch internally. I think I'll kill > that confusing warning in RTDM rev.6 already now.
Done (for the 2.4 series): http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/xenomai?rev=2901&view=rev Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
