On Thu, August 9, 2007 09:45, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> But my negative error code does not help me in any way now. >>> rt_dev_close() fails and therefore I'm having trouble using the same >>> program more than once ;) >> Oops, sorry (RTFM - read the fine mail...). Indeed, -524 means >> -ENOTSUPP, and this error code is only returned in the asymmetric >> closure case. >> But that is actually broken in itself. Such a high error code should not >> leak into userland, and we would run better with returning -ENOSYS. That >> would trigger an automatic context switch internally. I think I'll kill >> that confusing warning in RTDM rev.6 already now. > Done (for the 2.4 series): > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/xenomai?rev=2901&view=rev
Thanks...but since we don't get 2.4 running at the moment and are running out of time, is there an easy workaround ? To my understanding should it work, if I do a printf before rt_dev_close to switch to secondary mode. Well....but it doesn't. Greets, Nadym ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
