Nadym Salem wrote: > On Thu, August 9, 2007 09:45, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> But my negative error code does not help me in any way now. >>>> rt_dev_close() fails and therefore I'm having trouble using the same >>>> program more than once ;) >>> Oops, sorry (RTFM - read the fine mail...). Indeed, -524 means >>> -ENOTSUPP, and this error code is only returned in the asymmetric >>> closure case. >>> But that is actually broken in itself. Such a high error code should not >>> leak into userland, and we would run better with returning -ENOSYS. That >>> would trigger an automatic context switch internally. I think I'll kill >>> that confusing warning in RTDM rev.6 already now. >> Done (for the 2.4 series): >> http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/xenomai?rev=2901&view=rev > > Thanks...but since we don't get 2.4 running at the moment and are running > out of time, is there an easy workaround ? To my understanding should it > work, if I do a printf before rt_dev_close to switch to secondary mode.
Yes, it should. The patch just removes the need for this printf (or rt_task_set_mode). > Well....but it doesn't. Means you still get the same warning on the kernel console? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
