Hi,


> are interested in. Look for the PCI Device id (the vendor id is always 0x8086 
> at Intel) and compare it
> with the list that is coded in the rt_e1000 driver (file e1000_main.c,  array 
> e1000_pci_tbl around line 100).

Thanks this is helpful. Would you know whether the realtek driver and 
the other drivers might also be valid for a number of different device 
numbers?

Kind regards,

Roland

> 
> Regards
> 
> Mathias
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am a bit confused. There seem to be a number of Intel GBit LAN chips 
>> but are they all supported by the rt_ep1000 driver?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Roland
>>
>> M. Koehrer wrote:
>>> Hi Roland,
>>>
>>> ok, if you do not want to use a server mainboard, did you check the
>> mainboards from 
>>> Intel? I assume that they will use their own network chips on it...
>>> And I think there a board that are not too expensive (compared against
>> server boards). 
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Mathias
>>>> Karl Reichert wrote:
>>>>> Mathias Koehrer wrote:
>>>>>> the Intel Pro/1000 chip is not outdated at all.
>>>>>> Many professional (server) mainboards are using this chip.
>>>>>> E.g. look at the www.supermicro.com web page for server mainboards.
>>>>>> There are many mainboards that have 2 Intel Gigabit NICs onboard
>>>>>> which work fine with rtnet.
>>>>>> Also there are PCI or PCIe adapters available from Intel that work
>> fine
>>>>>> aswell.
>>>>> I can confirm that. I'm using an Intel Pro/1000 (driver rt_e1000)
>> network
>>>> card with RTnet and the driver works fine. This card is sold for 35 EUR
>> in
>>>> germany, for example at www.reichelt-elektronik.de
>>>>
>>>> I also use the intel Pro/1000, the realtek 8139, nationalsemi (natsemi) 
>>>> conductor chip, SysKonnect, (Sys98...) and Via Rhine which all work with
>>>> rtnet. Only thing is that I cannot find a current motherboard with any 
>>>> of the above chips at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> What is the exact specification of the intel chips that work.
>>>>
>>>> I do have the drawback that I would not want a board that is too 
>>>> expensive either which makes server mainboards a less attractive choice.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Roland
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTnet-users mailing list
>> RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
>>
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to