On Friday, November 18, 2011 10:23:00 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> 
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> No we don't, but I can throw a few points here, what I am typically doing.
> 
> 1) Replace the BR: rubygem(rspec) => BR: rubygem(rspec-core). Typically
> I add above some comment like "# Use rspec-core until rspec are not
> migrated to RSpec 2.x" just to remember.
> 2) Use command "rspec spec/" in your check section. This typically
> replaces similar call for RSpec 1.x, which was "spec spec/"
> 3) Now you have to check that the test suite passes. If not, you have to
> make it compatible and submit patch upstream. Usually it is not required
> and it will just work. However sometime it needs more effort. Recent
> example might be rubygem-little-plugger [1]. You can see that the patch
> is very simple and was easily accepted by upstream.
> 
> Thats it. In the future, once all gems are RSpec 2.x ready, the
> rubygem-rspec package should be migrated from RSpec 1.x to RSpec 2.x and
> from that time, it will be possible to use again the rubygem(rspec)
> provider.
> 
> 
> Vit
> 
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754355

Thanks Vit, 

I'll use this guide for my OpenNebula rubygem dependencies I'll be working on 
this and next month.

Shawn

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

Reply via email to