Dne 13.2.2012 20:40, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 01/25/2012 04:46 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
rubygem-ffi-0:1.0.9-2.fc16.src
rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.fc15.src
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
aeolus-conductor-devel-0:0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
rubygem-rspec
rubygem-daemon_controller-0:0.2.6-2.fc17.src
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --arch=src --whatrequires rubygem-rspec
The only remaining packages are:
rubygem-ffi (bkearney) - seems to be just packaging bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760009
rubygem-linode (stahnma) - upstream is already RSpec 2.x compatible,
it is FTBFS currently and it would deserve update anyway
aeolus-conductor-devel (mmorsi, clalance, sseago) - Hm, are
rubygem(rspec-rails) 2.6 compatible with RSpec 1.x? I doubt it ...
rubygem-daemon_controller (pwu) - It seems there should not be issue
running with RSpec 2.x, although I did not tested it.
Could we move forward and let the rubygem-rspec to follow the
upstream RSpec version and Require: rubygem(rspec-core)?
+1, lets move forward with this. I'm in the process of updating the
aeolus-conductor codebase to work against ruby 1.9.3 and will look
into incorporating an update to rspec 2 into this.
Since linode, ffi, and daemon_controller have been taken care of and
we've long announced the update to rspec2 in F17, lets perform the
final cutover. If there are issues going forward, we can easily
introduce a rspec1 compat package.
-Mo
Mo,
You mentioned in the packaging discussion that you have prepared patches
for rubygem-rspec to migrate them to RSpec 2.x, is that right? Could you
share them with us?
Vit
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
