On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >My main downstream project is based on 1.8 (since that's what's in RHEL > >and will be for a while) so I'd like to see at least two releases with > >1.8 to give me time to transition my work to 1.9 completely. > > May be you should start to be worried about RHEL 7.
I am looking to the future and especially to Ruby 1.9. :) > Honestly, if you are developing for current RHEL, then it is best to > develop on RHEL. If you are developing for future RHEL, then it is > best to develop on Rawhide. However, this is not discussion about > RHEL but about Fedora. That's already the process. As I said, I'm just being conservative about the transition; i.e., the idea of "we're going to completely dump LANG vX for LANG vY with this release" (when there are incompatibilities between X and Y) gives me chills. ;) -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpZgJkiM8J9A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
