Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/08/2015 12:30 AM:
Dne 7.1.2015 v 15:59 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote:
Dne 7.1.2015 v 06:07 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
To answer your question about why we just run "ruby -e
this-long-and-complicated-copypasta" instead of "testrb", see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-May/001585.html
. The gems that use rspec do have a much shorter/saner %check section.
Ha, this reminds me that the guidelines should be updated finally. Any
volunteer? :)
I didn't realize we hadn't updated the guidelines yet! :)
Here you go: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/489
Magnificent! Thank you Ken.
BTW Mamoru, what is your plan with regards to rubygem-test-unit and
testrb2? Shouldn't we deprecate it as well? Does it even work currently?
There does not look to be %{gem_instdir}/bin in test-unit anymore and
with Ruby 2.2, the way how the testrb2 is created [1] will fail.
Well, this was very old craft, added 2 years ago (and the upstream
rubygem-test-unit removed testrb 35 months ago). Now I removed this
on F-22:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rubygem-test-unit.git/commit/?id=1187f8ae36ab318abef3f3b7effc05a23dfeea4f
Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
