Dne 13.1.2015 v 13:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/08/2015 12:30 AM: >> Dne 7.1.2015 v 15:59 Ken Dreyer napsal(a): >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Dne 7.1.2015 v 06:07 Ken Dreyer napsal(a): >>>>> To answer your question about why we just run "ruby -e >>>>> this-long-and-complicated-copypasta" instead of "testrb", see >>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-May/001585.html >>>>> >>>>> . The gems that use rspec do have a much shorter/saner %check >>>>> section. >>>> Ha, this reminds me that the guidelines should be updated finally. Any >>>> volunteer? :) >>> I didn't realize we hadn't updated the guidelines yet! :) >>> >>> Here you go: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/489 >> >> Magnificent! Thank you Ken. >> >> BTW Mamoru, what is your plan with regards to rubygem-test-unit and >> testrb2? Shouldn't we deprecate it as well? Does it even work currently? >> There does not look to be %{gem_instdir}/bin in test-unit anymore and >> with Ruby 2.2, the way how the testrb2 is created [1] will fail. > > Well, this was very old craft, added 2 years ago (and the upstream > rubygem-test-unit removed testrb 35 months ago). Now I removed this > on F-22: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rubygem-test-unit.git/commit/?id=1187f8ae36ab318abef3f3b7effc05a23dfeea4f > >
Thanks. Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
