Aleksandar, > Thank you. What I can't spot in there is requirements around mini-portile and > having gem dependencies match these of upstream. I see that version can be > changed, no guideline about removing items.
I am not familiar with mini_portile. I have only used it a few times in my past time. Maybe. https://github.com/flavorjones/mini_portile I think it is possible to update the document by yourself if you like. The document is not updated since January 2015. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby Below document might be useful for you to update document. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Reporting_problems_with_Docs Jun On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Aleksandar Kostadinov <akost...@redhat.com> wrote: > Jun Aruga wrote on 12/15/17 13:47: >> >> Alexander, >> >>> Do we have a requirements document about ruby packaging? I'm all for >>> avoiding upstream incompatibilities which we are currently not doing for >>> some reasons. And having an official requirements document will make more >>> clear what is a bug and what is a feature. >> >> >> We have a document for Ruby packaging here. >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby > > > Thank you. What I can't spot in there is requirements around mini-portile > and having gem dependencies match these of upstream. I see that version can > be changed, no guideline about removing items. > >> Below is a proposed document for Ruby 2.5. >> The section Detailed Description might be close for the requirement. >> But I think that there is NOT requirement document for Ruby 2.5 as far >> as I know. >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.5 >> > ... -- Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech Republic _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
