Jun Aruga wrote on 12/15/17 15:12:
Aleksandar,
Thank you. What I can't spot in there is requirements around mini-portile and
having gem dependencies match these of upstream. I see that version can be
changed, no guideline about removing items.
I am not familiar with mini_portile. I have only used it a few times
in my past time. Maybe.
https://github.com/flavorjones/mini_portile
I think it is possible to update the document by yourself if you like.
The document is not updated since January 2015.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
I just know about that mini_portile discrepancy and I don't agree with
it. The thing is whoever takes the decisions to ban some dependencies an
make incompatible changes to document it for future reference.
Below document might be useful for you to update document.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Reporting_problems_with_Docs
Jun
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Aleksandar Kostadinov
<akost...@redhat.com> wrote:
Jun Aruga wrote on 12/15/17 13:47:
Alexander,
Do we have a requirements document about ruby packaging? I'm all for
avoiding upstream incompatibilities which we are currently not doing for
some reasons. And having an official requirements document will make more
clear what is a bug and what is a feature.
We have a document for Ruby packaging here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
Thank you. What I can't spot in there is requirements around mini-portile
and having gem dependencies match these of upstream. I see that version can
be changed, no guideline about removing items.
Below is a proposed document for Ruby 2.5.
The section Detailed Description might be close for the requirement.
But I think that there is NOT requirement document for Ruby 2.5 as far
as I know.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.5
...
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
