Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig wrote on 2025/12/20 22:24:
Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig wrote on 2025/12/16 0:01:
Hello, ruby-sig folks
Again I tried rebuilding rubygem-XXX packages with 4.0.0dev (2025-12-12 master
2f151e76b5) .
Currently (ignoring rubygem-jekyll related packages) 9 packages FTBFS, which is
in better state
than before.
Then:
minitest 6.0.0 landed on ruby4.0.0dev 3 days ago (from 5.27.0), this now seems
to cause new FTBFS for 47 packages.
rdoc 7.0.0 (then 7.0.1) launded 2 days ago (from 6.17.0), this now seems to
cause new FTBFS for 6 packages.
Honestly I am at a loss...
For minitest, since many packages are not ready for minitest6, I submitted a
review request for
minitest5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2424184
I would appreciate it if someone would review this (review swap is welcomed).
Regards,
Mamoru
--
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
