Dne 22. 12. 25 v 10:58 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 12. 25 v 14:55 Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig napsal(a):Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig wrote on 2025/12/20 22:24:Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig wrote on 2025/12/16 0:01:Hello, ruby-sig folksAgain I tried rebuilding rubygem-XXX packages with 4.0.0dev (2025-12-12 master 2f151e76b5) . Currently (ignoring rubygem-jekyll related packages) 9 packages FTBFS, which is in better statethan before.Then:minitest 6.0.0 landed on ruby4.0.0dev 3 days ago (from 5.27.0), this now seems to cause new FTBFS for 47 packages. rdoc 7.0.0 (then 7.0.1) launded 2 days ago (from 6.17.0), this now seems to cause new FTBFS for 6 packages.Honestly I am at a loss...Just checked randomly 4 packages and 3 failures were: `cannot load such file -- minitest/mock (LoadError)`
I have reported this issue against Rails: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/56425 This should not harm. Vít
, which seems to be due to:https://github.com/minitest/minitest/commit/de9aac1d3f52224ae5d93a186d129c72d5ec979fSo shouldn't we start with minitest-mock? VítFor minitest, since many packages are not ready for minitest6, I submitted a review request forminitest5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2424184I would appreciate it if someone would review this (review swap is welcomed).Regards, Mamoru
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
