re: moving off sourcefoge.net... The issue to me is whether to become you own infrastructure provider... for us it is not an option since we have about 100GB of downloads per week :-\ Now SVN could be elsewhere and downloads @SF.net We have been using dreamhost for other needs which is reasonably cheap provide CVS, SVN and can support Trac. Anything like them, or related hosters can probbaly accomodate a Trac and a few developers.
In a related train of thoughts... A buddy and I where joking yesterday about an idea of an open source loose confederation of eclipse plugins projects... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederation A confederation by definition does not substitute itself to its members, but provides common essential services. "A confederation is an association of sovereign states..." :-) -- Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com nexB - Open by Design (tm) - http://www.nexb.com http://EasyEclipse.org - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of David Corbin > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 4:19 PM > To: rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [RDT-Dev] Patch and SF.net CVS issues > > > > > > Next up is an idea to stew on. We've got a group of german students > > who are working on preliminary refactoring support. We've got > > RadRails building on top of us. We may have a google summer of code > > student as well. Considering those new sources building on top of > > what we do - and considering the CVS issues - should we seriously > > consider migrating to using Subversion? > > Subversion is definately better than CVS, but Eclipse > integration is still not > as good as CVS. The real question to ask, is can we get off > of sourceforge > and go somewhere 'more stable'. > > > > > What are your gut reactions? I think it would benefit us in terms of > > letting others just use externals to keep in synch with us. for > > active development. Plus we'd gain the seemingly more > stable setup at > > SF.net and well - Subversion is supposed to be a better replacement > > for CVS already. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web > services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make > your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on > Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&; dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
