We have had a good development experience on Radrails using Subversion and Trac. The ability to reference tickets in checkins and see changeset is really a big plus. What we do with RadRails is develop (SVN, TRAC) on our servers and release on SF.net. So we've had success developing on our own stuff and taking advantage of SourceForge's bandwidth :)
On 4/29/06, David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 12:41 pm, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > re: moving off sourcefoge.net... > The issue to me is whether to become you own infrastructure provider... > for us it is not an option since we have about 100GB of downloads per > week :-\ Sourceforge is not the only infratructure provider for open source projects. JRuby is going to move somewhere this summer, and I think CodeHause is a leading contender. I don't much care where, as long as it's stable. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
