I would neglect backward compatibility to 3.1 for the sake of simplicity. Markus designker wrote: > Hi, > > What is the plan for contributions to RDT in regards to use of new 3.2 > features. As a baby step I have been looking at adding a simple Hello > World cheatsheet to RDT to accompany the complex webservices one that > already exist. I think newbies to RDT should have something as simple > to to get them going as the Java Development Tool HelloWorld cheatsheet. > > Looking at the JDT 3.2 cheatsheet XML I can see it uses the new > <command> tag which I believe would make the cheetsheets incompatible > with 3.1. > > I guess my question is should I code to 3.1 or 3.2 for compatibility? > > Regards, > Designker > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Rubyeclipse-development mailing list > Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development >
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rubyeclipse-development mailing list Rubyeclipse-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubyeclipse-development
